Visakhapatnam Port, India opens for import of goods into Nepal


Traders can finally import third-country goods using Visakhapatnam Port in India, as Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB), the central bank, has allowed banks to issue letters of credit (LC) to bring in cargoes using the seaport in Andhra Pradesh.

Issuing a directive, NRB has instructed commercial banks to issue letters of credit to clients using Visakhapatnam Port in the east coast of India to bring in goods from third countries.

Goods that arrive at the port can be ferried into the country using cargo trucks and railway, says the directive. These cargoes can enter the country via Nepal-India border points located in Biratnagar, Birgunj, Bhairahawa and Nepalgunj. In Birgunj, customs offices located inside and outside the dry port can be used for clearance of Nepal-bound cargoes, says the directive.

Although the Indian government had allowed Nepal to use Visakhapatnam Port for third-country trade during former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's visit to New Delhi in February, it had not formally come into operation, as banks were barred from issuing letters of credit for goods entering the country via the new trade corridor.

Letters of credit are a must for valuation of cargos at customs points, because they contain information on cost of goods, insurance and freight (CIF) based on which customs and other duties are fixed.

With the formal opening of Visakhapatnam Port, Nepal has gained access to second seaport for third-country trade. Currently, the port in Haldia, Kolkata, is the only seaport from where Nepal brings in or sends goods to third countries.

Although Visakhapatnam Port is located 1,436km away from the country, as against the distance of 704km between the Haldia port and Nepal, the port in Andhra Pradesh is expected to facilitate Nepal's third-country trade, as it is a deepwater port, where bigger cargo vessels can be docked. Use of bigger container ships for movement of cargoes reduces ocean freight cost.

On the other hand, the Haldiya port is relatively shallower and cargoes need to be reloaded into smaller vessels in Singapore before they arrive in Kolkata.

"The decision to formally bring Visakhapatnam Port into operation is good news, as container freight stations in Kolkata are becoming more congested," Rajan Sharma, immediate past president of Nepal Freight Forwarders Association, told the Post.

He, however, said the port has come into operation without appointing a focal agency that could process documents and address logistic problems faced by freight forwarders. "If this issue is not dealt with immediately, the cost of ferrying goods via Visakhapatnam port may rise," Sharma warned.

Earlier, freight forwarders had demanded that the government establish a consulate general's office in Visakhapatnam, as in Kolkata, to tackle these issues. But the government has said the Nepali embassy in New Delhi would handle all the works related to the port.

The freight forwarders had also suggested that state-owned Nepal Transit Warehousing Company Limited be allowed to process documents and address logistic problems faced by freight forwarders.

"But the government did not listen to us," said Sharma, adding, "Later we asked the government to deal directly with the Visakhapatnam Customs House, which had agreed to do so. Yet the government did not agree and decided to allow the embassy in New Delhi, which is quite far away from Visakhapatnam, to deal with us. This decision is likely to create another barrier for third-country trade via Visakhapatnam Port."

(source: Kathmandupost 27 October 2016)

Back to recent news

Recent News

Islamic Unfunded Risk Participation Guide 16/08/2023

The above guide, which can be downloaded from the link below, has been kindly provided by Mr...more

Summer 2023 Newsletter added to Member Information section 14/07/2023

News from the ICC Banking Commission meeting of 11 July 2023 - Opinion TA927, TA Briefing 7, ISBP 821, eUCP appendix, Dual Use goods and Price Checking of Goods and Services documents released by ICC...more

Latest Question

Our bank, on behalf of the beneficiary, and acting in the capacity of presenting bank, remitted documents drawn under a documentary credit to the counters of the confirming bank (said documentary remittance being subject to UCP 600). The confirming bank refused the documents citing discrepancies. Their advice of refusal stated the disposal documents to be HOLD. We reverted, instructing them to remit the documents to the issuing bank, subject to UCP 600. The confirming bank acknowledged receipt of our instructions, sending us a FIN MT799, reproduced below. Quote BILL AMT : USD XXX THE ITEM DESCRIBED HEREIN IS FOR YOUR ACCOUNT. PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF OUR INSTRUCTIONS BELOW APPLICANT: A BENEFICIARY: B WE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED PRESENTATION. AS PER YOUR INSTRUCTIONS WE HAVE FORWARDED THE DOCUMENTS TO THE ISSUING BANK. AFTER RECEIPT OF FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE ISSUING BANK, THE MATTER OF SETTLEMENT WILL RECEIVE OUR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. WE USE GREAT CARE IN SELECTING OUR FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS AND PREFER TO PUT OUR FOREIGN COLLECTIONS THROUGH THEM. IN THE EVENT YOU DESIGNATE A CORRESPONDENT OTHER THAN THE ONE OF OUR OWN SELECTION, WE SHALL FOLLOW YOUR INSTRUCTIONS UPON THE EXPLICIT UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU ASSUME AND CONFIRM ALL THE ACTS OF SUCH CORRESPONDENT OF YOUR OWN CHOOSING AND AGREE TO HOLD US HARMLESS FROM ALL CONSEQUENCES THEREOF. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED HEREIN, THIS DOCUMENTARY REMITTANCE IS SUBJECT TO THE ICC'S UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS (VERSION IN FORCE ON THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THIS L/C). Unquote My understanding is that the documents have been remitted by the confirming bank direct to the issuing bank, as opposed to using an intermediary (collecting bank/agent). Is that correct? It may be the case that the confirming bank is trying to tell us that they will route the proceeds / payment to us by using the services of foreign correspondent banks and so the message acts as a type of legal disclaimer i.e., that they are not liable or responsible for any failures or omissions on the part of these correspondent banks. Is my interpretation correct? Is this message for informational purposes only or do we need to take any action / reply to safeguard the interests of our bank and our client (L/C beneficiary)? Please note that in our remittance letter we provided them with settlement instructions / USD nostro correspondent bank details. I trust in the event the issuing bank elects to honour the presentation the confirming bank will arrange for net proceeds to be credited to the nostro account we maintain with our USD correspondent. Please let me know if you believe I have in any way misunderstood or misinterpreted their message. If I have misunderstood, please could you outline for me what the confirming bank is trying to tell us. This is the first time I have come across something like this and I am wondering if it is usual nowadays for certain foreign banks to issue messages with such wording.