News

Visakhapatnam Port, India opens for import of goods into Nepal

28/10/2016

Traders can finally import third-country goods using Visakhapatnam Port in India, as Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB), the central bank, has allowed banks to issue letters of credit (LC) to bring in cargoes using the seaport in Andhra Pradesh.

Issuing a directive, NRB has instructed commercial banks to issue letters of credit to clients using Visakhapatnam Port in the east coast of India to bring in goods from third countries.

Goods that arrive at the port can be ferried into the country using cargo trucks and railway, says the directive. These cargoes can enter the country via Nepal-India border points located in Biratnagar, Birgunj, Bhairahawa and Nepalgunj. In Birgunj, customs offices located inside and outside the dry port can be used for clearance of Nepal-bound cargoes, says the directive.

Although the Indian government had allowed Nepal to use Visakhapatnam Port for third-country trade during former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's visit to New Delhi in February, it had not formally come into operation, as banks were barred from issuing letters of credit for goods entering the country via the new trade corridor.

Letters of credit are a must for valuation of cargos at customs points, because they contain information on cost of goods, insurance and freight (CIF) based on which customs and other duties are fixed.

With the formal opening of Visakhapatnam Port, Nepal has gained access to second seaport for third-country trade. Currently, the port in Haldia, Kolkata, is the only seaport from where Nepal brings in or sends goods to third countries.

Although Visakhapatnam Port is located 1,436km away from the country, as against the distance of 704km between the Haldia port and Nepal, the port in Andhra Pradesh is expected to facilitate Nepal's third-country trade, as it is a deepwater port, where bigger cargo vessels can be docked. Use of bigger container ships for movement of cargoes reduces ocean freight cost.

On the other hand, the Haldiya port is relatively shallower and cargoes need to be reloaded into smaller vessels in Singapore before they arrive in Kolkata.

"The decision to formally bring Visakhapatnam Port into operation is good news, as container freight stations in Kolkata are becoming more congested," Rajan Sharma, immediate past president of Nepal Freight Forwarders Association, told the Post.

He, however, said the port has come into operation without appointing a focal agency that could process documents and address logistic problems faced by freight forwarders. "If this issue is not dealt with immediately, the cost of ferrying goods via Visakhapatnam port may rise," Sharma warned.

Earlier, freight forwarders had demanded that the government establish a consulate general's office in Visakhapatnam, as in Kolkata, to tackle these issues. But the government has said the Nepali embassy in New Delhi would handle all the works related to the port.

The freight forwarders had also suggested that state-owned Nepal Transit Warehousing Company Limited be allowed to process documents and address logistic problems faced by freight forwarders.

"But the government did not listen to us," said Sharma, adding, "Later we asked the government to deal directly with the Visakhapatnam Customs House, which had agreed to do so. Yet the government did not agree and decided to allow the embassy in New Delhi, which is quite far away from Visakhapatnam, to deal with us. This decision is likely to create another barrier for third-country trade via Visakhapatnam Port."

(source: Kathmandupost 27 October 2016)


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

A credit required: “1 COPY OF APPL'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID (THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT). THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FINAL PURCHASE PRICE AMOUNT AND EIGHTY PERCENT (80%) INVOICE AMOUNT OF THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE. WITHIN FIVE (05) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF COPY OF FINAL INVOICE FROM THE BENEFICIARY THROUGH ELECTRONIC MAIL, THE APPLICANT SHALL SEND COPY OF APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING CERTIFYING THAT THE DRAWING AMOUNT IS IN ORDER. IN THE EVENT THAT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN ABOVE MENTIONED TIME, THE BENEFICIARY SHALL PRESENT 20% LC DOCUMENT AGAINST DISCHARGE PORT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING.” Beneficiary presented their confirmation with amount to be paid being the difference between the final purchase price amount and 80% invoice amount of the provisional invoice. Can issuing bank raise a discrepancy of: 1. Certificate of confirmation not issued by the applicant as LC required or 2. Unpresentation 1 copy of applicant’s certificate of confirmation unpresentation. Because issuing bank received applicant’s confirmation that amount to be paid differs with amount to be paid by beneficiary (applicant showed deduction which is not mention under LC) plus applicant provided proof that applicant sent email to beneficiary within 5 banking days as LC required and amount to be paid. Whether or not applicant is protected by any terms or conditions of UCP, ISBP or ICC opinions,… because they presented applicant’s confirmation to beneficiary but beneficiary did not present applicant's document under their presentation?