News

ICC Releases publication titled "Trade is critical to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals"

27/09/2022

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and its members are committed to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and tackling climate change. ICC is confident that economic growth, job creation and investment in more sustainable trade are vital to reach those goals. 

How are trade and the SDGs connected? 

This publication shows that complex, yet measurable interlinks exist between assessing the sustainability of trade throughout the full environmental, social and governmental lenses.  

Using figures and data, it explores how trade can incorporate means of implementation of the SDGs, at a multidimensional and global level among them:  

  • redeciding poverty (SDG 1) 
  • promoting economic growth (SDG 8) 
  • responsible consumption and production (SDG 12) 

It focuses on the ways in which trade can be a central push forward in finding solutions to mitigate climate change (SDG 13). The power and means of trade actors to develop low carbon technologies as well as incentivising such creations is indeed a key advantage.  

The industry also requires standardisation in the key issues of emissions, definitions on what constitute or not sustainable trade. This provides a clear picture thus clarifying emissions allowances and effective decarbonisation strategies.  

How can trade help mitigate climate change effects?  

An important way trade helps in the sustainable field is also through the complementary policies taken in liberalising and facilitating the low carbon trade behaviors, digitalised and new technology incentives as well as implementing robust and ambitious international trade agreements with active labor market and educational policies. 

Finally, it is crucial that trade is observed and analysed in a nuanced and multidimensional approach.  

Trade is not only a set of changes of goods and services which generates greenhouse gases. In a complex environment to understand such as sustainability in trade it can be appealing to use macro level of data such as non-tariff measures (NTMs) or Harmonised System (HS) codes.  

However, taken by themselves without taking into account the various fields mentioned above and in the study will inevitably give an over simplified picture that trade creates a negative contribution to the SDGs.  

How is ICC making business work for the planet? 

ICC is at the forefront of the action by means of its work, notably around: 

  • carbon pricing mechanism 
  • sustainable trade  
  • trade finance definition framework 

 

The publication can be accessed here


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

A credit required: “1 COPY OF APPL'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID (THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT). THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FINAL PURCHASE PRICE AMOUNT AND EIGHTY PERCENT (80%) INVOICE AMOUNT OF THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE. WITHIN FIVE (05) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF COPY OF FINAL INVOICE FROM THE BENEFICIARY THROUGH ELECTRONIC MAIL, THE APPLICANT SHALL SEND COPY OF APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING CERTIFYING THAT THE DRAWING AMOUNT IS IN ORDER. IN THE EVENT THAT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN ABOVE MENTIONED TIME, THE BENEFICIARY SHALL PRESENT 20% LC DOCUMENT AGAINST DISCHARGE PORT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING.” Beneficiary presented their confirmation with amount to be paid being the difference between the final purchase price amount and 80% invoice amount of the provisional invoice. Can issuing bank raise a discrepancy of: 1. Certificate of confirmation not issued by the applicant as LC required or 2. Unpresentation 1 copy of applicant’s certificate of confirmation unpresentation. Because issuing bank received applicant’s confirmation that amount to be paid differs with amount to be paid by beneficiary (applicant showed deduction which is not mention under LC) plus applicant provided proof that applicant sent email to beneficiary within 5 banking days as LC required and amount to be paid. Whether or not applicant is protected by any terms or conditions of UCP, ISBP or ICC opinions,… because they presented applicant’s confirmation to beneficiary but beneficiary did not present applicant's document under their presentation?