News

ICC releases latest Trade Finance Survey

25/05/2018

The 2018 Survey, titled “Global Trade – Securing Future Growth” is now available via the ICC’s website and the following link https://iccwbo.org/publication/global-trade-securing-future-growth/

The link will take you to the ICC website where you will be required to complete a short registration form. Upon submission of the form, you will receive an email with a link to download the survey document. The link is good for one download.

As usual, the publication includes annual statistics provided by SWIFT (for 1 January to 31 December 2017). Highlights of these statistics are:

MT700’s issued in 2017 was 4,247,185 which gave an average of 353,932 per month.

For all regions, the breakdown in forms of availability for a documentary credit was:

Negotiation 73%

Payment 11%

Deferred Payment 9%

Acceptance 7%

Overall, trade finance volume fell by 2.35% in 2017, but this was 50% of the fall seen for 2016 (4.72%).

Category 7 messages fell 1.56% and category 4 by 5.3%.

The average value of a documentary credit rose to USD537k from USD463k in 2016.

Banks in Asia, unsurprisingly, issued 73.8% of the MT700’s and received 77.2% of the annual volume.

Banks in Bangladesh issued the largest number of MT700’s and banks in China received the highest number.


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

A credit required: “1 COPY OF APPL'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID (THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT). THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FINAL PURCHASE PRICE AMOUNT AND EIGHTY PERCENT (80%) INVOICE AMOUNT OF THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE. WITHIN FIVE (05) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF COPY OF FINAL INVOICE FROM THE BENEFICIARY THROUGH ELECTRONIC MAIL, THE APPLICANT SHALL SEND COPY OF APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING CERTIFYING THAT THE DRAWING AMOUNT IS IN ORDER. IN THE EVENT THAT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN ABOVE MENTIONED TIME, THE BENEFICIARY SHALL PRESENT 20% LC DOCUMENT AGAINST DISCHARGE PORT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING.” Beneficiary presented their confirmation with amount to be paid being the difference between the final purchase price amount and 80% invoice amount of the provisional invoice. Can issuing bank raise a discrepancy of: 1. Certificate of confirmation not issued by the applicant as LC required or 2. Unpresentation 1 copy of applicant’s certificate of confirmation unpresentation. Because issuing bank received applicant’s confirmation that amount to be paid differs with amount to be paid by beneficiary (applicant showed deduction which is not mention under LC) plus applicant provided proof that applicant sent email to beneficiary within 5 banking days as LC required and amount to be paid. Whether or not applicant is protected by any terms or conditions of UCP, ISBP or ICC opinions,… because they presented applicant’s confirmation to beneficiary but beneficiary did not present applicant's document under their presentation?