News

ICC Banking Commission submission on BCBS revisions to the standardised approach to credit risk

29/07/2015

Earlier this year, the ICC Banking Commission, through its Trade Register Working Group, was invited to respond to proposals published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) entitled 'Revisions to the standardised approach (RSA) for credit risk and capital floors: The design of a framework based on standardised approaches.' In a letter sent to the BCBS on 23 March 2015 the ICC, speaking on behalf of the trade finance industry, expressed its support for the recalibration of the existing framework. The Banking Commission's submission, which has recently been released by the ICC, addresses numerous substantive issues. Specific recommendations include requests for the BCBS to consider:

Differentiated treatment for claims on banks less than 90 days old and rolled over.

CCF for commitments be revised to 20% or 50% based on exposure/product, in lieu of 75%.

The application of 0% CCF for certain types of trade finance commitments.

Recalibration of CCF from 50% to 20% for certain types of trade-related guarantee exposures.

A redrafting of clause 53 aimed at ensuring consistency in the application of CCF to Letters of Credit. 

A copy of the submission can be viewed here ICC Letter to BCBS Revisions to the Standardised Approach to credit risk.pdf


Back to recent news

Recent News

Lloyds, SocGen turn to eUCP for digital letters of credit 18/09/2026

Société Générale and Lloyds have completed a fully digital trade transaction between the UK and France, using Enigio’s technology, in what the French lender describes as a first-of-its-kind deal...more

UK Court endorsement of the letter of credit autonomy principle 18/09/2026

Although the central issue in the case of Trafigura v SONARA [2026] EWHC 1914 (Comm) concerned an anti-suit injunction to enforce the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in a sale contract, the Commercial Court's decision serves to reaffirm the principle and purpose underpinning letters of credit: that the obligation to pay under a letter of credit is autonomous and independent of the underlying trade transaction, the objective being to shift the risk of non-payment under the underlying contract from the seller to the buyer...more

Latest Question

We, as issuing bank, issued a credit available with any bank by negotiation at sight with the following clauses in field 78: +T/T reimbursement allowed +Our bank will pay the amount within 4 working days following the day of our receipt of reimbursement claim by SWIFT and email copies of documents from the negotiating bank certifying that the documents presented are fully complied with the terms and conditions of our credit. The claiming SWIFT has also to give the following details : shipment date, B/L NO., shipment quantity, description of goods, the courier service name and the relative courier service number. The negotiating bank must send the full set of documents by courier service to us the same day of your sending us the reimbursement claim. The negotiating bank must email the full set of documents with the covering schedule to the issuing bank email address :xxx@sina.com the same day of reimbursement claim. Question: According to the A/M clauses, which view is correct and why? View 1: when the issuing bank receives the copy of documents sent by email, the issuing bank should check the copy of documents. If they find them discrepant, the issuing bank should send advice of refusal to the negotiating bank. (In other words, the credit allows the presentation of documents by email and by T/T reimbursement claim?) View 2: ONLY when the issuing bank receives the full set of ORIGINAL set of documents by courier, the issuing bank will begin to check the documents. If they find them discrepant, the issuing bank should send advice of refusal to the negotiating bank.