News

ICC announce the revision of the Uniform Rules for Bank Payment Obligations (URBPO)

10/04/2018

ICC Banking Commission Digitalisation of Trade Finance Working Group: Approved EXCO mandate for revision of URBPO 

As discussed in the Banking Commission Executive Committee call of 7 March 2018. 

Mandate 

The Banking Commission Executive Committee has authorized the Steering Committee of the Digitalisation Working Group to proceed with a revision of the Uniform Rules for Bank Payment Obligations (URBPO). 

Background 

Under the auspices of the ICC Working Group on Digitalisation in Trade Finance, the ICC Banking Commission created a sub-stream for BPO that included three objectives: 

1. Marketing and Awareness of BPO in its current state. 

2. Revision of the URBPO to include the roles and responsibilities of buyers and sellers and modify it to address conditions within distributed ledger technologies (DLT) that create obligations. 

3. Address in conjunction with the “standards” stream of the digitalisation working group data standards which improve the Trade Services Utility (TSU) and/or lay the framework for smart contracts and other data enablers to support DLT. 

The initial aim of the second objective was to evaluate the existing URBPO in order to determine whether a revision of the rules would be required. 

Rationale for revision of URBPO 

As mentioned in the introduction to the URBPO rules, the scope of the rules lies solely in the bank-to-bank space as agreed in the memorandum of understanding signed between ICC and SWIFT in September 2011. The URBPO do not cover the interaction between a bank and their corporate client. 

However, it was recognised at the time of drafting that, at a future indeterminate date, a ‘phase 2’ would be required in order to address incorporation of the buyer and seller into the rules (including, but not limited to, the four corner model for Supply Chain Finance). In view of the fact that many ICC National Committees had requested such an objective, the concept of a ‘phase 2’ was openly communicated at various Banking Commission plenary sessions. 

In addition, with the advent of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) & Blockchain applications, there is a further need for a form of risk mitigation. As such, modification of the URBPO is required in order to address conditions within DLT technologies that create an obligation to pay and facilitate financing. 

Provided the rules can be revised to accommodate such progress, the BPO can serve as a framework for risk mitigation in the emerging technologies. 

Composition of Group 

The group, chaired by Mike Quinn, is a sub-stream of the ‘e-compatibility of ICC Rules’ work stream co-chaired by David Meynell and Gary Collyer. Pursuant to National Committee recommendations, a core drafting team with the necessary skills is now in place. 

Next Steps 

The BPO sub-stream is to proceed with the revision of URBPO in order to incorporate buyer and seller and to take note of emerging technologies. Any further changes will be identified as the drafting work progresses. 

An outline of the overall aims of the BPO sub-stream to be presented at the ICC Banking Commission Annual Meeting in Miami, April 2018. 

National Committees and members will be given the chance to review and comment on the drafts provided by the working group. Either an initial revision of URBPO, or an outline of work-to-date, will be made available in time for the ICC Banking Commission Technical Meeting in Georgia, October 2018. 


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

Our client will open a letter of credit for the import of goods (spare parts). Payment terms will be 90 days after bill of lading date provided that our customer will check the goods whether they are in good order and condition prior to proceeding with the payment, either for the full amount/part of the amount/or not to proceed with payment at all if the goods are not found to be in good order and condition. Please let us have your opinion on the below 2 questions, and on the wording of the clauses which will be added under Additional Conditions of the L/C in order to secure our customer concerning the payment of the L/C: Question 1: The confirming letter which will be presented by the applicant to us (Issuing Bank), whether it should be requested under the DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Field 46A of the credit OR whether it should be considered as a special term that concerns only the payment and should be requested under Additional Conditions of the credit as follows: PAYMENT WILL ONLY BE EFFECTED AT MATURITY (90 DAYS AFTER BILL OF LADING DATE) SUBJECT TO FULFILMENT OF POINTS 1 AND 2 BELOW: 1. UPON PRESENTATION OF COMPLIANT DOCUMENTS AT OUR COUNTERS AND DELIVERY TO APPLICANTS TO CLEAR GOODS FROM CUSTOMS; 2. UPON PRESENTATION BY ΤΗΕ APPLICANT (DIRECTLY TO THE ISSUING BANK) OF A WRITTEN LETTER CONFIRMING, EITHER: (A) THAT THE GOODS RECEIVED ARE IN GOOD ORDER AND CONDITION AND THE ISSUING BANK SHALL PROCEED WITH PAYMENT OF THE FULL INVOICE VALUE AS PRESENTED OR (B) THAT ONLY PART OF THE GOODS RECEIVED ARE IN GOOD ORDER AND CONDITION AND CLEARLY STATING THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID UNDER THE LETTER OF CREDIT, IN FULL SETTLEMENT OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT (WITHOUT FURTHER BENEFICIARY'S CONSENT) AND IRRESPECTIVE OF THE INITIAL VALUE OF THE INVOICE PRESENTED. THE PAYMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCLUSIVE ON BOTH PARTIES (APPLICANT AND BENEFICIARY) AND ISSUING AND NOMINATED BANK OR (C) GOODS RECEIVED ARE NOT IN GOOD ORDER AND CONDITION AND CLEARLY STATING THAT APPLICANT REJECTS PAYMENT OF ANY AMOUNT UNDER THE LETTER OF CREDIT, WITHOUT THE NEED OF BENEFICIARY'S CONSENT AND IRRESPECTIVE OF THE INITIAL VALUE OF THE INVOICE PRESENTED. THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCLUSIVE ON BOTH PARTIES (APPLICANT AND BENEFICIARY) AND ISSUING AND NOMINATED BANK. THE WRITTEN LETTER MAY BE PRESENTED AFTER THE EXPIRY DATE OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT BUT NOT LATER THAN 85 DAYS FROM BILL OF LADING DATE. Question 2: Please clarify whether the above document should be presented within the validity of the L/C (i.e., Shipment date + Presentation Period) or whether it can be presented after the expiry of the L/C (e.g., 85 days after the bill of lading date).