News

ICC announce postponement of the ICC Banking Commission Technical Meeting scheduled to be held in Limassol, Cyprus on 26-29 October 2020

25/06/2020

The ICC released the following on 25 June 2020:

“Due to the ongoing global health crisis, the Banking Commission leadership and ICC Secretariat  in close consultation with ICC Cyprus has to inform you that the ICC Banking Commission Technical Meeting in Limassol originally scheduled on 26-20 October 2020 will be postponed.

This decision was made to:

•    Ensure the health and safety of our employees, delegates, speakers and partners, which is our number one priority. 

•    Anticipate that many of you will not be in a position to travel due to ongoing restrictive measures. The Banking Commission events have always been an inclusive gathering of the trade and trade finance network. It is through this diversity and scope that our events have become the success they are today. That is why we want to give banks and the trade finance community the necessary time they need to adjust and recover.  

We will work closely with the Chairs of the various Workgroups and Task Force to carry on with the programme of the ICC Banking Commission on a virtual basis. We will be in touch with you all once relevant information will be made available.    

We look forward to seeing you all in Dubai for our Annual Meeting in 2021.”


Back to recent news

Recent News

Spurious Emails 24/11/2025

There appears to be some spam messages circulating apparently from an email address                                      no-reply@collyerconsulting...more

Autumn 2025 Newsletter added to the Members Trade Information section 31/10/2025

This newsletter covers the 6 opinions that were approved by the ICC Banking Commission on 21 October...more

Latest Question

1/ According to the Guarantee, the Guarantee is governed by the URDG and the law of Italy. The guarantee document does not specify the exact content of the Demand Document when claiming the payment. In this case, does the content in the guarantee exclude the provision of sub-article 15 (a) in the URDG? Or does the Demand Document still need to comply with the requirements of sub-article 15 (a) of the URDG when claiming payment (e.g., indicating in what respect the applicant is in breach of its obligations under the underlying relationship)? 2/ Regarding this clause: 'against your first written demand and this notwithstanding any objection of whatever nature by ABCDE Mechanical Construction Joint Stock Company or any third party and without necessity of any legal or judicial proceedings', if there is a court order to suspend the payment, is the Guarantor allowed to stop the payment and comply with such order? /QUOTED/ FORM OF BANK GUARANTEE FOR ADVANCE PAYMENTS We, XYZ bank, with main office in [address] guarantee to you on behalf of ABCDE Mechanical Construction Joint Stock Company for the amount of USD 783,848.75 (In words: Seven hundred eighty-three thousand, eight hundred forty-eight dollars and seventy-five cents). This bank guarantee comes into force only after the receipt by the Guarantor of USD 783,848.75 (In words: Seven hundred eighty-three thousand, eight hundred forty-eight dollars and seventy-five cents). for further credit to the applicant’s account no. 12345678 (USD Account) with the Guarantor, provided such remittance identifies this guarantee no. (insert when issue officially) and the contract no. xyz and valid for the whole amount until 06/15/2027 Demand(s) for payment and document under this guarantee must be made in English and quote this guarantee number and submitted in paper by the beneficiary's bank in one lot by courier to our counter at above mentioned address (attention: [name]) on or before the expiry date. This Guarantee is governed by/subject to the latest version of Uniform rules for Demand guarantee (URDG), ICC Publication but to the extent the practices make no provision for the matter in question, this Guarantee is governed by/subject to the laws of Italy. /UNQUOTE/