News

BP incorporates CargoDocs electronic Bill of Lading clause into its Voyage Charter Party

13/05/2016

Article in International Shipping News - 12 May 2016

BP recently incorporated a CargoDocs electronic Bill of Lading clause into its latest Charter Party, BPVOY5, as eB/L adoption continues to accelerate across Energy trades globally.

BPVOY5 Clause 30 (pertaining to Bills of Lading) states that (i) Bills of Lading may be ‘transmitted electronically using the ESS-Databridge', i.e. via CargoDocs and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the DSUA, and (ii) that an eB/L satisfies all the requirements to be deemed the legal equivalent of a paper Bill of Lading.

Specifically, relevant sub-sections from the eB/L clause in BPVOY5 read as follows:

30.3 - Charterers may require Owners to ensure that any Bill of Lading under this Charter (whether or not signed on behalf of Owners) is issued and signed in electronic form and transmitted electronically using the ESS-Databridge (such Bill of Lading an "eDoc") in accordance with the terms and conditions of the ESS-Databridge Services & Users Agreement as amended from time to time in accordance with its terms ("the DSUA").

30.4 - An eDoc shall be deemed to satisfy any applicable law, contract term, custom or practice requiring that any Bill of Lading issued under this Charter be made or evidenced in paper format and/or in writing and/or signed.

The inclusion of the above comes at a time when eB/L uptake is ramping up across Tanker and Bulker trades in the Energy, Agri, Metals and Chemicals sectors.

Most notably, it marks the first time an Energy Major such as BP has incorporated an eB/L clause in its Charter Party, following a similar move by leading Mining and Agri companies over the past two years.

Source: essDOCS


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

A credit required: “1 COPY OF APPL'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID (THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT). THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FINAL PURCHASE PRICE AMOUNT AND EIGHTY PERCENT (80%) INVOICE AMOUNT OF THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE. WITHIN FIVE (05) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF COPY OF FINAL INVOICE FROM THE BENEFICIARY THROUGH ELECTRONIC MAIL, THE APPLICANT SHALL SEND COPY OF APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING CERTIFYING THAT THE DRAWING AMOUNT IS IN ORDER. IN THE EVENT THAT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN ABOVE MENTIONED TIME, THE BENEFICIARY SHALL PRESENT 20% LC DOCUMENT AGAINST DISCHARGE PORT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING.” Beneficiary presented their confirmation with amount to be paid being the difference between the final purchase price amount and 80% invoice amount of the provisional invoice. Can issuing bank raise a discrepancy of: 1. Certificate of confirmation not issued by the applicant as LC required or 2. Unpresentation 1 copy of applicant’s certificate of confirmation unpresentation. Because issuing bank received applicant’s confirmation that amount to be paid differs with amount to be paid by beneficiary (applicant showed deduction which is not mention under LC) plus applicant provided proof that applicant sent email to beneficiary within 5 banking days as LC required and amount to be paid. Whether or not applicant is protected by any terms or conditions of UCP, ISBP or ICC opinions,… because they presented applicant’s confirmation to beneficiary but beneficiary did not present applicant's document under their presentation?